Yes, it's his fault
The prosecution's case: Defence lawyer in Cornell University case calls for special prosecutor to be removed
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case BFDFA4B1BA902D86E409 · 2026-10-06
The Trump Jury
Defence lawyer in Cornell University case calls for special prosecutor to be removed
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
The defence lawyer argues that comments by Attorney General Letitia James disqualify her from the investigation.
What the record shows: The investigation into the rape allegations is ongoing.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Defence lawyer in Cornell University case calls for special prosecutor to be removed
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Defence lawyer in Cornell University case calls for special prosecutor to be removed
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense submits that the call for the removal of Attorney General Letitia James is a necessary step to ensure a fair investigation. Supporters might argue that her comments on the case demonstrate a bias that could compromise the integrity of the proceedings.
What Trump Did
The defense might suggest that this situation highlights the importance of impartiality in legal matters, a principle that should transcend political affiliations. The defense admits that ensuring a fair process is paramount, especially in cases involving serious allegations.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that this call for disqualification is a stand for justice, emphasizing that every defendant deserves a fair trial free from prejudgment. The defense might suggest that this is a crucial moment for the legal system to uphold its standards.
The Supporting Record
The defense submits that Attorney General James's previous comments could be perceived as prejudicial, thus warranting her removal from the case. The defense might argue: This aligns with the principle of fairness that is foundational to the legal system.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
However, the defense might argue that while the comments were made, they do not necessarily indicate an inability to conduct a fair investigation. The defense admits that the legal process must be respected.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: The call for removal ensures a fair investigation.
- Supporters' theory: Impartiality is crucial in legal matters.
- Supporters' theory: Every defendant deserves a fair trial.
Reality Check
The defense lawyer argues that comments by Attorney General Letitia James disqualify her from the investigation.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: October 7, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the defense's call for the removal of Attorney General Letitia James is not merely a procedural maneuver, but a desperate attempt to shield the accused from accountability. The prosecution alleges that this tactic is part of a broader strategy to undermine the integrity of the investigation, which is crucial in a case involving serious allegations of rape.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution submits that the defense's actions are reminiscent of tactics used by Trump and his allies to evade justice. The prosecution imagines that this is not just about one case, but a reflection of a culture that seeks to protect powerful individuals at the expense of victims.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, if Attorney General James is removed, it sets a dangerous precedent that could embolden other defendants to challenge the legitimacy of investigations against them.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that allowing such a move could result in a future where victims feel discouraged from coming forward, fearing that their cases will be dismissed based on technicalities rather than the merits.
Closing Argument
The prosecutor alleges that this is not just about one attorney general; it is about the very fabric of justice in our society.
Verdict
The prosecution submits that the defense's request is a thinly veiled attempt to protect the powerful, and justice must prevail.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
The defense lawyer argues that comments by Attorney General Letitia James disqualify her from the investigation.