Yes, it's Trump's fault
The prosecution's case: Lindsay Clancy's lawyer asks judge to investigate juror and check his phone
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 3576D46893CA7B1407A1 · 2026-09-22
The Trump Jury
Lindsay Clancy's lawyer asks judge to investigate juror and check his phone
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
The attorney wants the court to look at the juror's mobile phone use and answers on questionnaires.
What the record shows: The request involves investigating a juror's conduct during the trial.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: Lindsay Clancy's lawyer asks judge to investigate juror and check his phone
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: Lindsay Clancy's lawyer asks judge to investigate juror and check his phone
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense might argue: Lindsay Clancy's legal team is taking proactive steps to ensure a fair trial by requesting an investigation into a juror's mobile phone use. The defense submits that this is a necessary measure to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
What Trump Did
The defense might argue: While this case is not directly linked to Trump, supporters might argue that the emphasis on transparency in legal proceedings reflects a broader commitment to accountability that many associate with his administration.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that this focus on juror integrity is a reflection of the values Trump espoused during his presidency, where the rule of law was paramount.
The Supporting Record
The defense admits that ensuring jurors are not influenced by external factors is crucial for justice. The defense might argue: This request aligns with the ongoing efforts to maintain public confidence in the legal system.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
However, the defense might argue that this request should not be seen as an indictment of the juror but rather as a standard procedure to safeguard against potential biases.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: Transparency in legal proceedings is essential.
- Supporters' theory: This reflects Trump's commitment to accountability.
- Supporters' theory: Upholding the rule of law is crucial.
- Supporters' theory: This request is standard procedure.
Reality Check
The attorney wants the court to look at the juror's mobile phone use and answers on questionnaires.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: September 23, 2026 at 10:02 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in the POLL above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
Poll
All Responses
Live0 verified votes
Yes, it's Trump's fault
0%
No, it's not Trump's fault
0%
Too soon to tell
0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the request to investigate the juror's mobile phone use is a clear indication of a larger conspiracy at play. The prosecution alleges that this is not merely about one juror, but rather a calculated attempt to undermine the integrity of the entire judicial process.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution submits that the juror's phone could contain communications with outside influences, potentially orchestrated by shadowy figures connected to Trump. The prosecution imagines that this juror's actions are part of a broader scheme to manipulate the outcome of the trial.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, if this juror is found to have been compromised, it could lead to a mistrial, which would then embolden other jurors to act similarly. The prosecution urges that this could spiral into a complete breakdown of the justice system, where every trial is questioned.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution admits that allowing this investigation to proceed could expose the court to further scrutiny, revealing a network of deceit that could reach the highest levels of government.
Closing Argument
For the prosecution, this is not just about one juror; it is about the very fabric of our democracy being threatened by the likes of Trump and his allies.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution concludes that the evidence points to a deliberate attempt to subvert justice, and the jury must consider the implications of allowing such behavior to go unchecked.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
The attorney wants the court to look at the juror's mobile phone use and answers on questionnaires.