Yes, it's Trump's fault
New Mexico's Lawsuit Exposes the Hidden Hand of Trump in Epstein's Crimes
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 2479B123CC2B354C4FF2 · 2026-10-21
The Trump Jury
New Mexico sues Epstein lawyer and accountant, accusing them of hiding his sex crimes
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
Both men have denied having any knowledge of Epstein's crimes.
What the record shows: Both men have denied knowledge of Epstein's crimes.
ProsecutionSatire
New Mexico's Lawsuit Exposes the Hidden Hand of Trump in Epstein's Crimes
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
New Mexico's Lawsuit Against Epstein's Associates: A Step Toward Justice
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense might argue: New Mexico's lawsuit against Epstein's lawyer and accountant marks a significant move toward holding those who enabled Epstein accountable. The defense submits that this action is a necessary step in addressing the systemic issues surrounding Epstein's crimes.
What Trump Did
The defense might argue: While some may attempt to link this case to Trump, the defense might argue that the focus should remain on the individuals directly involved. The defense admits that Epstein's network was vast, but it is crucial to separate the actions of these defendants from any political figures.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that this lawsuit reflects a growing recognition of the need for accountability in cases of sexual abuse and exploitation. The defense might suggest that this is a victory for victims seeking justice.
The Supporting Record
The defense submits that the lawsuit is based on credible allegations and aims to uncover the truth about Epstein's operations. The defense might argue that this is a pivotal moment for victims' rights.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
However, the defense might argue that while the lawsuit is important, it should not be used as a political weapon against Trump or any other public figure.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: The lawsuit is a victory for victims.
- Supporters' theory: Accountability is finally being pursued.
- Supporters' theory: This case highlights systemic issues.
Reality Check
Both men have denied having any knowledge of Epstein's crimes.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: October 23, 2026 at 2:02 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in the POLL above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
Poll
All Responses
Live0 verified votes
Yes, it's Trump's fault
0%
No, it's not Trump's fault
0%
Too soon to tell
0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the recent lawsuit against Epstein's lawyer and accountant is not merely a legal maneuver but a direct line to the very heart of the Trump administration. The prosecution alleges that these men, while denying knowledge of Epstein's heinous acts, are part of a larger conspiracy that reaches into the highest echelons of power.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution submits that Epstein's connections to high-profile individuals, including Trump, create a web of complicity. The prosecution imagines that these defendants, by representing Epstein, were not just passive actors but active participants in a scheme to protect powerful figures.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, if these men are found guilty of hiding Epstein's crimes, it could lead to a cascade of revelations implicating Trump himself.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that if these defendants are allowed to escape justice, it sets a dangerous precedent for future cases involving powerful individuals. The prosecutor imagines a future where the rich and powerful can hide behind their lawyers and accountants without fear of repercussion.
Closing Argument
The prosecution submits that this lawsuit is just the tip of the iceberg, revealing a systemic issue that must be addressed.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that justice must prevail, and the truth about Trump's connections to Epstein must be uncovered.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
Both men have denied having any knowledge of Epstein's crimes.