Yes, it's his fault
The Return of Firing Squads: A Dark Legacy of Trump's America
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case CE2E9881C1380770C727 · 2026-10-12
The Trump Jury
Why the US is bringing back firing squads
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
The execution of Fort Hood gunman Nidal Hasan would be the first time the US Army had used a firing squad since 1945.
What the record shows: The US Army had not used a firing squad since 1945.
ProsecutionSatire
The Return of Firing Squads: A Dark Legacy of Trump's America
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
Firing Squads: A Bold Step Towards Justice
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
The defense submits that the decision to execute Nidal Hasan by firing squad marks a significant moment in the pursuit of justice for the victims of the Fort Hood shooting. Supporters might argue that this method, while controversial, is a necessary measure to ensure accountability for heinous crimes.
What Trump Did
The defense might suggest that under Trump's administration, there was a renewed focus on law and order, which has led to a more decisive approach to justice. The defense admits that this execution reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law.
Why Supporters Credit Him
Supporters might argue that this decision is a testament to the administration's resolve in dealing with domestic terrorism. The defense submits that the use of firing squads could be seen as a way to send a strong message against those who commit acts of violence against innocent civilians.
The Supporting Record
The defense might argue: The defense might highlight that the last use of a firing squad was in 1945, and this decision is a return to a method that some view as a more honorable way to carry out justice. However, the defense might argue that this is not about glorifying violence but about ensuring that justice is served.
The Limitation or Competing Explanation
The defense admits that while some may view this as a step backward, it is essential to consider the context of the crime and the need for a strong response.
Verdict
If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: The execution reflects a commitment to upholding the rule of law.
- Supporters' theory: This decision sends a strong message against domestic terrorism.
- Supporters' theory: The return to firing squads is viewed as a more honorable method of justice.
Reality Check
The execution of Fort Hood gunman Nidal Hasan would be the first time the US Army had used a firing squad since 1945.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: October 13, 2026 at 12:02 PM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in VOTE HERE above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
The jury so far
0 verified votes
Yes, it's his fault0%
No, it's not his fault0%
Too soon to tell0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the decision to execute Fort Hood gunman Nidal Hasan by firing squad is a chilling reminder of the dark legacy left by the Trump administration. The prosecution alleges that this method of execution is not merely a historical footnote but a reflection of the violent rhetoric that permeated Trump's presidency.
Exhibit A: The Plausible Link
The prosecution submits that the revival of firing squads is a direct consequence of Trump's divisive policies, which emboldened extremist views and fostered a culture of violence. The prosecution imagines that this is not just about Hasan; it is about the normalization of brutality in American society.
The Domino Effect
In the prosecution's theory, the use of firing squads could lead to a slippery slope where executions become public spectacles, further desensitizing the populace to violence.
The Hidden Danger
The prosecution urges that this decision could have dire implications for civil liberties, as it sets a precedent for inhumane punishment. The prosecutor imagines a future where executions are televised, turning death into entertainment.
Closing Argument
The prosecution submits that the return of firing squads is a grim reminder of the consequences of unchecked power and a society that has lost its moral compass.
Verdict
The prosecution alleges: The prosecution asks the jury to consider the implications of this decision and hold accountable those who have paved the way for such a regressive act.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
The execution of Fort Hood gunman Nidal Hasan would be the first time the US Army had used a firing squad since 1945.