Yes, it's Trump's fault
The prosecution's case: 'We've got to run': Inside ruined Ukraine power plant under constant drone threat
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Case 8BB3609CAB28554EE47A · 2026-11-12
The Trump Jury
'We've got to run': Inside ruined Ukraine power plant under constant drone threat
Read both sides. Cast your verdict. Predict the crowd.
- 1 Case
- 2 Verdict
- 3 Prediction
- 4 Results
Step 1
Read the case
Neutral facts
Dan Johnson visits one of the country's largest power stations, barely left standing after a ballistic missile strike by Russia.
What the record shows: The power station has suffered significant damage from attacks.
ProsecutionSatire
The prosecution's case: 'We've got to run': Inside ruined Ukraine power plant under constant drone threat
The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.
Read the full prosecution
DefenseSatire
The defense's case: 'We've got to run': Inside ruined Ukraine power plant under constant drone threat
The extreme defense of the sourced event.
Read the full defense
The Result
Supporters might argue that the resilience shown by Ukraine in the face of adversity is a testament to their strength and determination. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense submits that while the situation is dire, it is essential to recognize the efforts made by the Trump administration to support Ukraine in various capacities. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that Trump's policies aimed at strengthening NATO and providing military aid were crucial in preparing Ukraine to withstand such attacks. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that the missile strike on the power plant is tragic, but it highlights the importance of continued support for Ukraine, which Trump championed during his presidency. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense might argue that the ongoing conflict is a result of long-standing geopolitical tensions, not solely Trump's actions. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: In this fictional courtroom, the defense emphasizes that the resilience of Ukraine is a victory in itself, showcasing their ability to endure despite the odds. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.
Defense exhibits
- Supporters' theory: Ukraine's resilience is commendable.
- Supporters' theory: Trump's military aid was crucial.
- Supporters' theory: NATO's strength is a deterrent.
- Supporters' theory: The conflict is complex and multifaceted.
- Supporters' theory: Ukraine's spirit remains unbroken.
Reality Check
Dan Johnson visits one of the country's largest power stations, barely left standing after a ballistic missile strike by Russia.
Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.
Connecting to the jury room…
Final verdict announced: November 13, 2026 at 9:01 AM ET
Step 2 · Personal verdict
Your verdict
Cast your verdict in the POLL above. Then predict the jury here.
No account required. One active verdict per browser; you can change it while voting is open.
Step 3 · Crowd prediction
Predict the jury
When this case closes, what percentage of readers will say “Trump’s fault”?
Step 4 · Reader verdict
Poll
All Responses
Live0 verified votes
Yes, it's Trump's fault
0%
No, it's not Trump's fault
0%
Too soon to tell
0%
- Your verdict
- —
- Your prediction
- —
Only 0 points away
100Accuracy score
Results are based on participating site visitors and are not a scientific poll.
Voting closed
Step 5 · Challenge your friends
Can you beat my prediction?
Your jury record
This browser
- Cases judged
- 0
- Average accuracy
- —
- Current streak
- 0
Opening Argument
The prosecution argues that the devastation of Ukraine's power plants is a direct consequence of the reckless policies endorsed by Trump. The prosecution alleges that his administration's failure to support Ukraine has emboldened aggressors like Russia, leading to catastrophic strikes on vital infrastructure. Exhibit A: The Plausible Link: The prosecution submits that the missile strike on one of Ukraine's largest power stations is not just an isolated incident; it is a symptom of a larger failure of leadership that Trump represents. The prosecution imagines a world where Trump's isolationist tendencies have left Ukraine vulnerable, inviting aggression from hostile nations. The prosecution alleges: The Domino Effect: The prosecution urges that this attack on the power plant is merely the first domino in a chain reaction that could lead to widespread energy shortages across Europe. The prosecution alleges: The Hidden Danger: The prosecution admits that the real danger lies in the potential for further escalation, with Trump’s policies leading to a weakened NATO and increased threats to global stability. The prosecution alleges: Closing Argument: In the prosecution's theory, the consequences of Trump's actions are dire, and the evidence is clear. The prosecution alleges: Verdict: The prosecution concludes that Trump’s legacy is one of destruction and chaos, with the ruins of Ukraine's power plants as a haunting reminder of his failures.
Prosecution exhibits
Reality Check
Dan Johnson visits one of the country's largest power stations, barely left standing after a ballistic missile strike by Russia.