IS IT TRUMP’S FAULT?

Real event · international · 2026-09-21

Sydney policeman allegedly disguised himself as Uber Eats rider before murders

Final verdict announced: September 22, 2026 at 4:01 AM ET

The Trump Jury

Is it Trump’s fault?

Tap Yes, it's his fault or No, it's not his fault. One vote per browser. No account required.

Yes, it's his fault No, it's not his fault Too soon to tell

0 verified votes

Yes, it's his fault 0%

No, it's not his fault 0%

Too soon to tell 0%

One vote per browser. You can change it while voting is open. Automated or burst votes are dropped from this tally.

Open the full jury case

What actually happened

Real headline

Sydney policeman allegedly disguised himself as Uber Eats rider before murders

Beaumont Lamarre-Condon has pleaded not guilty to the 2024 murder of his ex-partner and his new boyfriend.

The documented connection: No documented connection · Authority: none

What the record shows

Beaumont Lamarre-Condon has pleaded not guilty to murder.

Original reporting

Sources

• BBC News — Sydney policeman allegedly disguised himself as Uber Eats rider before murders — 2026-09-21
  Original reporting. Open the source; this site does not replace it.

Two articles. Two perspectives.

Read one from each side, then put your verdict in above.

Yes, it's his fault

The prosecution's case: Sydney policeman allegedly disguised himself as Uber Eats rider before murders

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that the actions of Beaumont Lamarre-Condon are not merely a tragic personal failure but a reflection of a larger, insidious trend linked to the culture fostered during Trump's presidency. The prosecution alleges that this case exemplifies how law enforcement officers, emboldened by a climate of impunity, can spiral into violence.

Exhibit A: The Plausible Link

The prosecution submits that Lamarre-Condon's choice to disguise himself as an Uber Eats rider is a direct manifestation of the chaotic environment that Trump’s policies have created, where individuals feel justified in taking the law into their own hands.

The Domino Effect

In the prosecution's theory, this act of deception is not isolated; it is part of a broader pattern of violence that has escalated since Trump's rhetoric normalized aggression.

The Hidden Danger

The prosecution imagines a future where police officers, feeling empowered by a lack of accountability, increasingly resort to violent measures, all while disguising their true intentions.

Closing Argument

The prosecution urges the jury to see this case not just as a murder trial but as a warning of the societal decay that Trump’s influence has wrought.

Verdict

The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that the evidence will show a clear connection between this heinous act and the toxic environment fostered by Trump's presidency.

The case for

1. Prosecution theory: Lamarre-Condon's actions reflect a broader societal decay.
2. Prosecution theory: The normalization of violence is a direct consequence of Trump's rhetoric.
3. Prosecution theory: Disguising oneself as an Uber Eats rider symbolizes a deeper moral corruption.

Reality Check

Beaumont Lamarre-Condon has pleaded not guilty to the 2024 murder of his ex-partner and his new boyfriend.

No, it's not his fault

The defense's case: Sydney policeman allegedly disguised himself as Uber Eats rider before murders

The Result

The defense might argue: Beaumont Lamarre-Condon’s case has drawn significant attention, but supporters might argue that it highlights the complexities of personal relationships rather than a reflection of systemic issues. The defense submits that the sensationalism surrounding this case overlooks the fact that many individuals face emotional turmoil without resorting to violence.

What Trump Did

The defense might argue: While some may attempt to link this case to broader societal issues, the defense might suggest that it is essential to focus on the individual circumstances surrounding Lamarre-Condon.

Why Supporters Credit Him

Supporters might argue that Lamarre-Condon’s actions stem from a place of deep emotional distress, exacerbated by personal circumstances rather than any political climate.

The Supporting Record

The defense admits that while the allegations are severe, they do not represent a trend but rather an isolated incident that should not be politicized.

The Limitation or Competing Explanation

However, the defense might argue that attributing blame to external factors like political rhetoric ignores the personal accountability that must be considered in this case.

Verdict

If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.

The case against

1. Supporters' theory: Lamarre-Condon's actions are a result of personal turmoil.
2. Supporters' theory: The case should not be politicized or linked to broader societal issues.
3. Supporters' theory: Emotional distress can lead to tragic outcomes without political influence.

Reality Check

Beaumont Lamarre-Condon has pleaded not guilty to the 2024 murder of his ex-partner and his new boyfriend.

Hub facts Yes, it's his fault No, it's not his fault Cast your verdict

Why do you think that?

Vote first, then leave one comment from this browser. Say why it is or isn’t Trump’s fault. No account. Comments are public and not a news report.

Name or handle Your take Post comment

1. No comments yet. Vote, then be the first to say why.

Share

Sydney policeman allegedly disguised himself as Uber Eats rider before murders

Post on X Share on Facebook Email

These open your own account. The network does not auto-post to social platforms.

Previous · Next · Archive · Canonical: /hub/stories/sydney-policeman-allegedly-disguised-himself-as-uber-eats-rider-before-m-ignrss