IT’S NOT TRUMP’S FAULT

The Result

Supporters might argue that the researchers' arrival at this crab-infested island is a testament to human curiosity and resilience. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense submits that this expedition, while fraught with challenges, showcases the spirit of exploration that many Americans admire. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that the determination to uncover the truth about Amelia Earhart reflects the same tenacity that Trump exhibited during his presidency. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense might suggest that the researchers' decision to sleep on their ship to avoid giant crabs demonstrates a practical approach to overcoming obstacles, much like Trump's strategies in business and politics. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense admits that the presence of these giant crabs, which can split open coconuts, poses a unique challenge, but it also highlights the adventurous nature of the expedition. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: In this fictional courtroom, the defense might argue that this endeavor is a celebration of exploration, not a cautionary tale. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.