IT’S NOT TRUMP’S FAULT

The Result

The defense submits that this incident is a clear example of how complex and vulnerable the US student aid system is. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense might argue that the previous administration's policies inadvertently created loopholes that allowed this scheme to flourish. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that the focus on immigration enforcement was intended to protect American interests, but it may have had unintended consequences. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that while the actions of these individuals are reprehensible, they are symptomatic of a larger issue within the system that needs addressing. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense might suggest that the real problem lies in the lack of oversight and accountability in the student aid process, not solely in the actions of a few individuals. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: The defense urges the jury to consider the systemic failures that led to this scandal rather than placing blame on any one individual or administration. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.