IT’S NOT TRUMP’S FAULT

The Result

The defense submits that this tragic incident, while unfortunate, should not overshadow the excitement and spirit of college football. The defense might argue: What Trump Did: The defense might argue that the event was a thrilling display of bravery, and the airman's commitment to his craft should be honored. The defense might argue: Why Supporters Credit Him: Supporters might argue that the airman’s daring descent was a testament to the American spirit, showcasing courage and determination. The defense might argue: The Supporting Record: The defense admits that while the outcome was tragic, the game continued in a show of resilience, reflecting the community's strength. The defense might argue: The Limitation or Competing Explanation: However, the defense might suggest that the decision to proceed with the game was made before the full extent of the tragedy was known, demonstrating a commitment to normalcy in the face of adversity. The defense might argue: Closing Argument: In this fictional courtroom, the defense emphasizes that the airman's legacy should inspire rather than deter future acts of bravery. The defense might argue: Verdict: If this is Trump's fault, his supporters will gladly let him take the blame.